Find a Lawyer

SHEHBAZ MAISH versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) benefited from the evidence at dusk at about 30 o'clock in the evening and no light was mentioned in the FIR until two witnesses, who were the first cousins of the victim, filed a complaint with the police. Did not state before or before the trial court stated that in the light of which they had identified the two accused, no identity was paraded and no witnesses were present in the case. During the investigation, a prosecution witness had clearly stated that he had been notified. The victim's real brother did not prove that the victim's real brother had been sent an empty letter after recovering carbon from the suspect, and it is likely that the said carbine was fired after being fired. It was prepared and then shipped, it cannot be decided. No dependence can be placed on the firearm specialist's report under the circumstances, no one was named in the FIR and no details were even given of the suspect in the highly suspicious case. By nature, the accused, through trial, benefited from punishment, punishment and punishment, the case was set aside. immigration advocates from Islamabad lawyer