AFZAAL AHMAD versus STATE
Definition of section 2302 (b) was proved by the prosecution's motive behind the incident. The testimony of the ocular was permanently and completely corroborated by the medical evidence, the FIR filed immediately excluded the possibility of false involvement in the crime, there were four witnesses present on the occasion. The contradictions were also natural due to the natural and timely supply of his statements, which were also of a minor nature, but the knife suspect recovered from the charge saying that the suspect had received the serologist's knife from the suspect. The recovery report was all reliable. Respect, who endorsed the prosecution's version, and in those cases the death sentence of the accused was upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Malakwal lawyer