RAHAM DAD versus STATE
Definition of Section 9 (b) Evidence Section 103, CRPC has been excluded by Section 25 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997, the prosecution's case was not fatal due to the absence of public witnesses in the recovery process. The officers were so good as witnesses and their statements could not be excluded simply because of their police personnel, the evidence of the retrieval was permanent, and the witnesses who were affected by the trust had no hesitation in suggesting false implications with the accused. No, the contradiction indicated in the prosecution's evidence was not material defense evidence. Unjustified sentences and convictions were also maintained under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Sherani lawyer