MUZAMMAL JAVED versus STATE
According to the record 498 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 406/420/506 bail, the accused's grant, according to the record, had contracted to sell his shop on the basis of Rs. A lawsuit was filed in the civil court that is still pending. After recording the evidence of the parties, the decision of the fate of the said contract will be made in accordance with the law. By turning the civil dispute into a criminal offense, non-compliance of the sale agreement did not prove any crime, between the parties. The dispute for the purchase and sale of the shop was civil and the prosecution's case will not be strengthened by sending the accused to jail. Nothing was recovered from it. An FIR was lodged after a delay of four years, which is very important in a four-month period, and it is not possible for the accused to be falsely implicated. The suspects were confirmed in a pre-approved interim arrest warrant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Talhur lawyer
