Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS ALIAS BASU versus STATE

The testimony of the Section 9 (b) evidence was fully proved by the prosecution by presenting the same to the court which was exhibited The chemical report was positive The non-production of the police officer's daily diary was not fatal in the case of the prosecution, Under the circumstances, the supply of Section 103 Cr was specifically excluded by Section 25 of the Narcotic Substance Act of 1997, in the event that non-compliance with the section 103 CCPC was delayed in sending the parcel. Was made, the absence of any suggestion will not affect the prosecution's case. By allegations of tampering with him in any way, contradictions were identified in the statements of the prosecution witnesses, which are minor in nature, said witnesses could not be ruled out on such contradictions, As such statements were made after some time it was recorded that the head of the evidence in the defense did not help the accused because the defense witness is genuinely harmful to the accused who did not appear before any official at the trial. Had been convicted of prosecution by the prosecution. advocates from Pir Mahal lawyer