Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus HAJI MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

The plaintiffs, claiming the rights of the Shafiqar East, "Shafiq Jar" and "Shafi'i-ul-Khalit", were formerly independent, and the plaintiff sued the land on the grounds that the Shafiqar East, "Shafi-jar" and "Shafi-al-Khalit" were sued. He was acquitted by a gift and was not a sale transaction and the trial court filed by the plaintiff was not rejected, but on appeal by the plaintiff, the appellate court settled the case. The decision and order of the hearing were set aside. Beat a legal source or device The plaintiff did not bring any evidence to prove that the suit property was sold to the defendant and its value was paid to the seller, on the other hand it was stated that The suit was gifted to the property. In addition to his statement through the change, defendant testified to the testimony of the change, which supported the dependency case that the suit property was separated by a gift and had no value in the relief record. In view of the existing evidence, the plaintiff failed to prove that it was illegal business and was not a gift suit; in the circumstances the trial court rightly dismissed and the judgment and order passed by the appellate court were submitted. Not upholding the decision of the law and the order passed by the appellate court were set aside and the trial court The judgment and order was maintained passed through. \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Chunian lawyer