SANOFI-SYNTHELABO versus ZAFA PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Section 11 Patent Ordinance (LXI of 2000), Patent Suit Violation The High Court's statement on the permanent termination period to prevent such infringement is the High Court's statement, Defendant waived the notion of effective proceedings. It was demanded that the defendant was prohibited from selling any other pharmaceutical ingredient / ingredient or compound \ clopidogrel ?? The plaintiff had no reason to prosecute, because the defendant's patent expired and the patent's Level violation has been charged. The plaintiff was faced with no evidence at the time, the legal status suit became invalid in the month of May 2014, on the plaintiff's instruction, the plaintiff's counsel stated that the plaintiff's instruction had been taken and, since the patent term, had been In any case, the matter expires by the end of May, 2014, therefore, the suit itself will be withdrawn. The suit has been forged. Neither party can achieve any motive in the case for any reason. Therefore, this case cannot be postponed and must be dealt with in the pursuit of the abortion concept of. Deleted due to the applicant becoming inconsistent with requests \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
