Defining the evidence (section), the accused recovered 110 grams of marijuana from the accused, and both the prosecution's witnesses, who witnessed the recovery proceedings, supported the prosecution's case, anything to prove. I was not told that the prosecution's witnesses had any enmity against the accused, in that case falsifying it was evidence that the witnesses affected the trust and proved it to be true. It may be stated that maintaining the conviction of the accused recovered from the accused was only 110 grams of marijuana and the record of this case in respect of any criminal history The accused's case had already passed reasonably well as the convict, along with the prisoner under trial, had been suffering from the case since 2005, while the accused's appeal was earlier dismissed. The period from the same was reduced and accordingly the penalty amount was also reduced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
