Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD HUSSAIN versus OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE, ISLAMABAD

Sections 3, 4, 13 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The application for restoration of the constitutional application was on the lease of the property owned by the applicants and was seized for the purpose of the general election. It was mandatory. The Authority has given the authority to issue a right hearing notice before seizing its vehicle and also depriving the use of the vehicle and on the other hand it was claimed by the respondent's Law Officer that the amount of the lease was also made. That the right of appeal has been granted under Section 4. The West Pakistan Stage Carriage (Temporary Powers) Ordinance, 1970 under the Ordinance, the constitutional petition filed by the applicant was not valid according to the security of the West Pakistan Stage Carriage (Temporary Powers) Ordinance, 1970, the authority authority DO (RO). If the motor vehicle is to be controlled for any public purpose, the condition is that the notice was previously given to the owner and the rights of the viewer were to be granted to the applicant. No notice was given of the owner of this vehicle; possession of the vehicle without notice is inherently illegal and legal practice. Without the authorities being obliged to pay the applicant on lease for the relevant period and according to the law he was entitled to claim compensation from the Election Commission, the law still has the right to appeal as the notice was not issued. Because this order was inherently defective, constitutional application can be entertained directly without the applicant being instructed to refer to an alternative forum. divorce advocates from Kot Addu lawyer