Find a Lawyer

SHAFAULLAH KHAN versus STATE

Section 193 The conviction for defining the evidence, the mitigation proceedings arose out of a civil appeal which was dismissed on grounds of non-prosecution, and the petitioner's counsel stated that the appellant's appeal to the court of appeal. Is equally responsible for excluding what was not possible. Properly advised by his counsel; the petitioner's lawyer cannot be denied the sentence; however, he requested reduction of the sentence on the basis that he in fact misled the applicant through his counsel. Who failed to appeal himself for an appeal hearing. The applicant, who was a Class IV employee in the PAF, spent more than a year in prison, which, in the circumstances of the case, was sufficient to meet the execution of justice, since the applicant was convicted. He was in jail and faced prison. For almost a year, which appeared to be sufficient to meet the end of justice in the circumstances of the case, the RI approved against the applicant, up to five years in prison, while retaining the applicant's sentence. Reduced in duration \ r \ n best law firms from Mamu kunjan lawyer