Section 302 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) defines the benefit of the doubt as well as the extra-judicial confession as well as the confession offense under Section 164, depending on the PC created by the accused. Were not eligible and no evidence was available against him after he was discharged Medical evidence did not speak of any sexual offense against the victim, it was impossible to recover, as he was retained till the time of the alleged recovery. Nor could it be preserved. The basis for the full version of the prosecution was that the accused used to seduce old women for inc zinc and then kill them after the commission of the Zina bill repression, but ina Zena's allegation was not proven during the trial and He was charged in this. Responded in the negative when the main allegation was not proven, the alleged confession cannot be relied upon without very strong evidence which could have a direct impact on the murder charge as such evidence was not available. The sentence could not be registered against the accused, in which case the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
