Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR MEHMOOD ALIAS ZAKAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) evidence was appreciated when the light was available, the attacker could easily be identified if the prosecution's witnesses were known and could not immediately be reported to the police. That the FIR was filed after an unknown delay. The prosecution's witnesses gave a consistent account of the incident and confirmed each other on all material points; there was no personal enmity or grudge against the accused from both of the prosecution's witnesses, who were alone in this case. Under false extermination, both eye witnesses were subjected to a lengthy cross-examination, but the internal value of their evidence could not be shaken the case was not as false as the complainant / prosecutor. The witness's cross-examination stood the acid test, the accused did not say that he had previously been involved in the prosecution's testimony. Didn't know. He himself claimed that there was a rift between him and the complainant evidence Ard had fully attended to the prosecution's witnesses at the relevant time, direct evidence from the medical evidence was fully supported, Medical Evidence supported the ocular account; all four spaces recovered from the pistol were recovered from the pistol at the direction of the accused. The FIR was fully supported by the prosecution's witnesses, in which cases the prosecutor successfully defended his case against the accused through direct evidence that the full evidence was obtained through medical evidence and vacated by chance. The recovery of the incident was confirmed on which the accused repeatedly opened fire on the oppressor us immigration advocates from Sara e Naurang lawyer