PAK TEA HOUSE versus ABID HUSSAIN SHEIKH
Section 1 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) and VIII, RR 10 and 11 Suit for Damages for Judicial Officers for Its Bead Act, after the plaintiff's retrial, in the previous case, the Judicial Officer filed his file Keep with you for months. , Which was eventually set aside and subsequently the plaintiff's request for damages was dismissed on the ground that the Judicial Officer (defendant) was found guilty of prejudice because of his dismissal of the trial. retained his former trial file with the intention of suing. To the extent of the Judicial Officer, the appellate court held that the plaintiff's decision that it could not be dismissed without allowing the plaintiff to prove that he was, in fact, a question, to prove Malada's allegation Will provide evidence for The officer had no protection under the law, the High Court accepted the review request for such action and set aside the improper order for the trial decision. Invitation of written statements by defendants, preparation of cases and case after trial
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Machh lawyer