Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34/109 bail, grant of further inquiry case was the blind murder of the deceased, his name was not listed in the FIR nor had any role. The only charge that was assigned was the evidence against the accused, allegedly due to poor evidence of extra-judicial confession by him nine months after the date of his presence, the same charge could not be relied solely on The nominee was named on the supplementary statement given by the accused's father. There was no direct evidence of the suspects involved in the murder of the alleged Sotah, who was recovered from the possession of the accused after the killing, as there was no result as no weapon wounds were found on the bodies of the deceased. Was not found. In the supplemental statement against the accused in the alleged murder of the deceased accused, the complainant was declared innocent by the Investigation Officer as well as the confirming Section H. The name of the accused in charge of the investigation was not included in the challan submitted before the trial court to grant the bail to the accused, the accused was entitled to the same exemption as per the law of consistency, the accused was admitted on bail. top civil advocates from Ubaro lawyer