Find a Lawyer

JAMIL ALIAS SABU versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 In the FIR, only one injury was proved fatal in the instant filing of the testimony of the accused. He had not produced a single witness before it was declared. The trial court was based on a hearing to support the plea of Alia, who took the exam in the Chief Gift of Defense witness, that the accused was found to be baseless without any concrete and concrete evidence. Nothing was revealed from the Ocular Account. Medical evidence was completely confirmed by unreliable sources and no further trouble was needed in this regard, on the occasion 12 of 20 boredom. , 30 of the 7 mm rifles and 10 of the 222 rifles, including 30 crime spaces were recovered. Weapons were present at the scene and the suspect was armed with a rifle. The accusation on the chest of the accused proved fatal but there was no chance of a lower sentence, but the prosecutor was proof that his case against the accused was proved by an ocular account, which included medical evidence. , Was punished and recorded by conviction. The trial court against the accused was fully intact criminal advocate from Jalozai lawyer