Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus STATE

Further investigation against the accused was found at section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 34 and 109, that he was present at the time of the incident and that Lalkara said that during the course of the incident, The recovery was not affected. Although the suspect's investigation appeared to be equipped with a rifle in the FIR, the investigating officer failed to prove any of his active role, except that the suspect was also held in the presence of an empty hand at his place. Was not named because the accused was behind bars only after his arrest and trial. In such circumstances, the grounds for further investigation into the crime of the accused were provided. best advocate from Besham lawyer