Find a Lawyer

FASTLINE (PVT.) LTD versus COLLECTOR CUSTOMS

Section 25 D & 81 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The constitutional jurisdiction of the applicant / reviewer was the process of assessment as the assessment was without conflict, and a provisional order under section 81 of the Customs Act 1969 No appeal can be placed against, so the constitutional petition must be admitted. On the other hand, the counsel of the authorities argued that in the presence of Section 25D of the Customs Act, 1969, the constitutional plea of the High Court authorities cannot be entertained that any law can be constitutionally applied to any person. Deprived of the right to give. According to Article 199 of the Constitution, the jurisdiction of the High Court was misconstrued, the Customs Act, 1969 could not be revoked as the assessee had not submitted any notice before the Assistant Collector Customs. , Was instructed to reassess the current order within two weeks of service O. instructed Pfizer to counter its estimate base before deciding the customs duty imposed on the product. Was gone online advocate from Dudial lawyer