Find a Lawyer

UMAR DRAZ ALIAS UMAR HAYAT versus STATE

Section 302 (c) testimony of the accused, the conviction for the reduction of the bodies of the two victims was recovered from the accused's house, blood stained land was also obtained from the yard of the accused's house, there was no business in the victim's house. At 10 o'clock in the morning on the day of the incident, the accused, although he did not accept the request for grave and sudden provocations, can still be taken into account if he is removed from the record. The provocation is processed. After the murder of the two victims, the accused was found guilty, but on each count his 14-year RI sentence was limited to 10 years' RI. Under the circumstances, the legal heirs of the suit were excluded under Section 44 AAA. Because, even in cases of serious and sudden provocation, he was not honored patent advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer