Find a Lawyer

AKHLAQ AHMAD versus STATE

Section 302 (b) evidence was appreciated overnight and eyewitnesses did not seize the light bulb claiming to be the light source on the spot when the investigating officer filed two days after the FIR What was The eyewitnesses were not only closely linked to the deceased, but also witnesses on the occasion who made their presence on the occasion of the crime without any explanation for such delays by the complaining party. No reason was given. Contradictory statements have been made and their credibility and credibility stand out because the background of enmity between the parties cannot be ruled out by the complaining party. The presence of eye-witnesses at the scene could not be linked to the crime of the accused, despite the suspicion of the incident, medical evidence could not identify the perpetrator of the crime, medical evidence, even otherwise, the witness The witness was also conflicted, witnesses were charged by the police at the next stage, it was alleged that the accused was acquitted. jobs for fresh advocates from Pishin lawyer