Find a Lawyer

ZIA-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) definition of evidence The conviction, the reduction of both eyewitness testimony, was the real brother of the victim, but he had no enmity or unlawful desire to expunge the accused against the accused in the light of day. The parties have a deep relationship. On the other hand, there was no question about false identification. The Ocular account was fully verified by medical evidence. The recovery of the screwdriver on the defendant's site was of no consequence because he had defended himself through self-defense. Admittedly there was nothing to hurt the screwdriver. On the record to prove the defense's request that in fact the complaining party was aggression because the accused alleged that no serious rivalry was found between the parties. However, there were some mitigating circumstances. However, the accused was in favor of the accusation. The first suspect was that the accused, who was equipped with a screwdriver, struck four victims on the victim's head, but only on the outer margin of the left orbit. A lacerated wound was inserted, with a sharp weapon. The suspect did not repeat the blow, the origins of the fight were spread in mystery. There was every possibility that there was some sort of dialogue between the parties and the suspect was likely to have split the two without disclosing the incident. Was. Between the two conviction of the accused under section 2302 (b), the PPC was retained, but its sentence was changed from death to life imprisonment with the benefits of Section 2B of B, CRP. C was converted into compensation under section 4444 AA, CRPC. criminal advocate from Dunyapur lawyer