Article 204 contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), section 3/4 contempt of court argument that Lahore Development Authority had filed an intra-court appeal against the High Court order passed in the constitutional petition. That the applicant was an employee of the Lahore Development Authority while exchanging the other department, that the Lahore Development Authority implemented the aforesaid High Court order and that the second department was bound to treat the applicants as permanent employees only. Will be. According to the terms of the said order and that the applicant did not have any funds or emergency for the payment of salaries to the applicants, it was clear from the High Court's misconception that the applicants were given permanent access to Lahore. The employee was declared development authority and the Bench of the Intra Court of Appeals after his transfer to another department was not suspended or dissolved by an interim order, so the constitutional petition was issued under reference to the respondents. The order will ensure payment of salaries and so on. Applicants to the other based on their permanent employment as announced by the evacuation department within two weeks, keeping in mind that the applicants are not entitled to receive money as permanent employees. The basis, though not valid, is that contempt of court proceedings against the respondent were not initiated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
