Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. GHULAM SAKINA versus STATE


Section (c) Definition of Evidence Trial Court Neglected All Defects by Prosecutor's Witnesses The major contradictions and contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution clearly suggested that the case was prepared at the police station The police did not take effect immediately after the raid.The information, even though the inquiry officer had sufficient time to obtain a search warrant under section 20 of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, did not obstruct his route. , So that they could not better understand the reasons for the enmity between the accused and them. Willis was severely offended by the accused, the purpose of making a false case against him was that the reasonable possibility of the correct version of the defense could not be excluded from consideration, in which case a number of genuine suspicions were alleged. Had been acquitted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Mari Indus lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.