Find a Lawyer

DILMEER versus STATE

The Skyland Site Plan and the first inspection report, appreciating the section 302 evidence, clearly showed that there was enough light of the electric bulb to identify the suspect at the relevant time when the presence of spectacular witnesses was present in the area. Being a resident was very modest and natural. Of these, supporting the trial case, it was unanimously stated that it was the accused who opened fire on him, resulting in injuries to various parts of his body and later. He died of injuries sustained in a fire in his hospital account. At the right thigh and leg of the victim, as mentioned in the FIR, as well as witnesses, possibly before the trial court, the post-mortem report found the possibility of assisting and cooperating that the remaining wounds were the result of the same two fires. Cannot be denied by the accused, even because otherwise, the prosecution's witnesses were not expected to explain each of the injuries to the victim, especially when the weapon was caused. So the ocular account was also matched by the evidence of the recovery, a report from the Office of the Forensic Science Laboratory revealed, on occasion The head was found similarities with the spaces being recovered from the suspect's weapon fire arm. Except for the perpetrator, the case of the sole accused of the deceased's relatives and mothers was an extraordinary case; in the present case, the victim's two sons, who were independent witnesses with their neighbor, dismissed the statements of the witnesses against him. ? Who were convinced in nature and found, without recovery list of supreme court advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer