Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALTAF HUSSAIN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appeal for Rehabilitation, Plaintiff / Divorced Wife PF Defendant's Rehabilitation, For Past and Future Rehabilitation for herself as well as Three Children For the suit, the plaintiff filed a fine of Rs 2,000 for each suit and her eldest son was dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff had divorced the defendant, while the eldest son had attained majority age. And did not rely on parents to care for it. The appeal filed by the defendant (husband) against the Family Court decision for each of them on the night of Rs 800 for the care of the other two children was dismissed while the plaintiff filed. Individuals were partially allowed only to the extent that an annual increase of Rs 100 would be included in the monthly allowance given to minors. Ed under section 14 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, for the simple reason that the rate of recovery allowance is less than one o'clock. Syed Barr, however, did not take action against the plaintiff / injunction holder where the allowance against the appeal was not more than a thousand rupees, without logic as it was intended to eliminate the issue of minor restitution allowance and to claimants. Protecting from the hardships of litigation, which could already be pressured hard to meet basic needs. Shall be used solely for the purpose of achieving justice or to avoid injustice or material irregularities that result in grave injustice. Down by the Court of Appeal decision property advocates from Upper Deval lawyer