Find a Lawyer

RASHID HUSSAIN versus SOOFI ABDUL HAMEED

Rent controller by the District Judge taking judicial notice of this agreement, presented by the landlord, as evidence (a) of the tenancy agreement between the parties, denying the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. The dismissal decision has been retained by. The tenant who was a tenant under the landlord's deceased brother. And such an agreement was not disclosed, but it was marked as \ A as, which he could not take seriously, thus, in his lawyer's statement the solemnly owned landlord. Was condemned as proof that his title was in the works, documents were in his favor. The Department of Excise and Taxation and similar contract tenants, after the landlord's lawyer made this statement, presented their evidence, but did not contest the agreement, which resulted in the landlord's deceased brother's widow. Had presented in his affidavit and statement in court. The tenant denied her claim that her estranged husband was the tenant of the tenant while the widowed woman who examined the cross did not challenge such statement to the tenant on the second appeal, therefore, Cannot authorize such application, which he did not raise in front of the rent controller. Documents to be kept on record by a party with the approval of the court, whether in the form of a document displayed or marked, may be considered, but by law, the district judge has entered into this agreement through a judicial notice. Properly considered, the widow's statement includes oral evidence of the homeowner, including gas and electricity bills. jobs for fresh advocates from Hunza Nagar lawyer