ZAHID HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Evidence At the relevant time, the presence of the sole witness was suspected that the witness was a resident of another locality and there was no explanation for his presence at the time of the incident. Was given Earlier in the day, it was reported that the witness was closely related to the complainant, the trial court correctly denied him the prosecution witness and his son stated that he had witnessed the incident and that The suspect allegedly burned her after pouring kerosene, but strangely, she never bothered to interfere or tried to save the suspect, but also informed the complainant and other witnesses. Leaving this place to the possibility that eye witnesses were later presented to strengthen the prosecution's case , Cannot be denied. The trial court had previously denied the evidence of recovery on valid and substantive grounds, the accused allegedly admitting his guilt before the prosecution's witnesses. On the day of the incident, but said the witness, who was very close to the complainant, never bothered to inform the complainant or the police immediately after the confession offense, but made a statement to the police the next day, hearing the confession. After the witness said such unnatural behavior of the witness was sufficient to doubt his credibility, even otherwise, the evidence of extra-judicial confession was a very weak type of evidence that usually formed at that time. Was given when the prosecution failed to collect any concrete evidence to prove the allegation and in the absence of any evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Hattar lawyer