Find a Lawyer

FAROOQ AHMED versus STATE

The witnesses did not seek arrest, nor did they have the authority to assist in the extra-judicial confession made by the accused accused of defining section 302 (b) evidence. And they also had a deep connection to the complainant, so it cannot be relied upon, nor can it be used against the co-accused, which is the proof of the prosecution that the accused was arrested at night. Was seen near, was not credible, as witnesses have since recorded their statements. During the six months and that time, he did not tell the facts to the witness or to any other prosecutor's witness, but he was not linked to the gun recovery from the accused. The prosecution's case was not established. The suspects were acquitted in circumstances beyond the shadow of a doubt advocates from Gilgit lawyer