AYYUB HUSSAIN versus STATE
On the basis of section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 324, 427, 148 and 149 of the sentence, the suspension of the sentence was requested that the defendant's story was denied during the trial while the accused. Was convicted under Section 302 (c), PPC. That the statement of the accused be partially beneficial and that the exclusion of the accused's statement cannot be excluded, and that the invalid part cannot be read in isolation as the offense is justified and that fact may be decided by the jurisdiction. I should be floating. The trial court itself, in its judgment, sentenced the accused to the exclusion of the exclusionary statement under section 342, CR PC, which would require reconsideration of the evidence and the man's re- Presence will prove to be an important point, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer
