MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE
Section 302 (b) definition of evidence. The late brother, who claims to be a witness to the fountain, and lived in a village about 3/4 km from the incident, was unable to justify his presence at the relevant time. The brother was asked about cross-examination of the victim with her husband, who also appeared as a prosecutor's witness, but did not tell the truth and tried to suppress the admitted facts, the victim said. The wife had made serious allegations against her husband of snatching her children, threatening to harass her and murder, and the victim's brother did not respond to all the facts even until the victim's son, Aini He claimed to be a witness and was not present at the time of the incident. The victim's son said his father / prosecutor witness He and his victim's mother denied the litigation at all, but the defense evidence also reflected that. The incident and it appears that the body of the deceased was found on the road which was brought to the police station and then the legal heritage of the victim was summoned and the case registered was evidence of witnesses who were close relatives and At the same time, they were hostile. With the deceased, it cannot be relied upon, especially when they were not ready to speak the truth about the admitted facts. The place of recovery of 30 bore pistols, which was owned by someone else, was open space. On the eve of the evacuation, only one match was found with the alleged weapons recovered from the suspect, but both were sent to the forensic science laboratory, a positive report of a vacancy.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer