Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHABBIR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) defines the evidence, the conviction was reduced to eight days after the defective triggering of the aggravating factor, and it has also admitted two prosecution witnesses whose credible accounts were presented. Medical evidence was according to the ocular account. The prosecution's case provided further assistance through eyewitnesses and recovery evidence, but its motive remained in mystery, the trial court pronounced the sentence and sentenced the accused to death, although the trial did not deny the motive. But the fact is that the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses had nothing. The contentious motive of falsely implicating the accused in the murder of the deceased prosecution did not prove to be a motive against the accused, who was surrounded in mystery by the accused. And other eyewitnesses did. In his statements before trial C he died alone eight days after the injury and there was nothing in the record to suggest that he had received proper medical care. The High Court upheld the conviction of the accused but sentenced him to death. The life sentence was changed accordingly and the appeal was dismissed. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Bunner lawyer