Find a Lawyer

ISLAM TRADING COMPANY THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, DRY PORT, SAMBRIAL, SIALKOT

Sections 25 and 30 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), the Section 3 intra-court appeals to the appellant / appraiser to determine the customs value of the goods, justifying that in accordance with the amount reported, The department has reduced the amount. On the basis of the obligation to pay, and on the basis of that assumption, the appellant could not uphold the right of appeal and the unanticipated demand was without legal authority, on the other hand, the authorities say that there was no scope for making the assumption. That letter also had a proper way. The appellant described the actual amount to be reviewed and claimed by the appellant, who was fully aware of the contents of the Assessment Order, and the Federal Tax Ombudsman Validity Notice clearly stated the amount against which the discriminatory duty Were found due to Both consignment records admit that this assessment was not challenged in any other way, nor was any competent authority or Core T reduced to the same appellant. In the circumstances, it cannot say that the issue of filing an appeal. I was misled by her appeal was dismissed famous lower court advocate from Kharan lawyer