SHAHID NAEEM KHAN versus SAIFUR REHMAN THROUGH QAMAR?-UN-NISA
The constitutional application for Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Rehabilitation Allowance, was decided by the Family Court and the Appellate Court, the defendant filed a constitutional petition against it. I was told that the responsibility for the family's care was on the father and that he should shoulder it using his talents, efforts and means, that the plaintiff was the son of the plaintiff and the defendant. Divorced his wife / defendant's mother, the plaintiff was entitled to receive restitution allowance from both of the below The allowance decisions and orders stated by the parties were clear, unambiguous and unambiguous, as well as in the absence of any legal weakness or permanent error in the decisions and orders received, to examine all the law and facts of the case. Were later approved. The following, approved by both the courts, cannot be interfered with in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
