Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY WAPDA, SAHIWAL

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (g) The trade union activities allegedly by the demotion worker acknowledged that its development was based on the level of the constituency and it was made clear that if its seniority later If not configured, it should be returned without notice. Workman also acknowledged the fact of his illiteracy and also that his employer had his own rules of promotion, the fact that the employee had been absent from duty for more than two years and was consequently reinstated. All such facts clearly show that what was done by the employer was done in accordance with the law and the rules and regulations, and at no stage was anything hidden from the laborer. In any order sanctioned for its development, removal, rehabilitation and demolition, the applicant's statement has proved to be an attractive point of fact, a matter of unfair labor practice against the employer in respect of labor reduction / reversal. Was not exposed, so the workman was not entitled to any relief. online advocate from Hasilpur lawyer