ASLAM SAEED versus MESSRS UNITED BANK LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (g) Applicant's proof of unfair labor was suspended after showcase notice and inquiry by an official of the Trade Union Service for the allotment of duty and non-payment of salary by the respondent. The refusal request was dismissed against his transfer, he dismissed his complaint request against the transfer in accordance with the Labor Court order, accepting the transfer by joining duty at the place of transfer. Did not retreat any further in connection with the transfer. It did not request unfair practice during critical times, challenging the transfer order, which would later be lifted, once the transfer is accepted, it is not open to the applicant. Was to challenge the same challenge as the creation of unfair labor. On the evidence of the practitioner it could not be ascertained that the applicant was denied the provision of residency duty. In the absence of suitable and appropriate substance, a fair labor practice against the defendant was not constituted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Ghazi lawyer