Find a Lawyer

KHALID ALIAS BAOO versus STATE

Testimonies of Section 9 (c) Evidence The same day, the police officers raided another accused's house and recovered drugs and a set of witnesses who had disbelieved in the present case and the accused in this case. The acquittal suffered the same defects as was seen in the case above. Property ie the narcotics were not presented to the trial court and, therefore, cannot be considered to be recovered from the accused. The court was fatal to the prosecution case, which terminated the Chemical Examiner's grounds that its report was not made on a regular basis and was not properly exhibited at the hearing, the Chief Chemical Examiner documents. Had offered his opinion from the previous. It was unclear in the report of the police station whether it belonged to the present case or the fact of the chemical Examiner's report from another case, as such, since W is not free from suspicion and cannot be safely relied upon by the accused. Has been acquitted of circumstances \ r \ n registration advocate from Chakwal lawyer