Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMED ALIAS PAPOO versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324, 337f (iii) and 337f (i) define the evidence as a chemical examiner, serologist and forensic science laboratory firefighting witness who was injured on various parts of his body during the incident. Five injuries were reported and the accused confessed to his presence at the time of his statement under section 342, the CRPC's statement that only the injured witness was sufficient to sustain the accused's conviction, here Even if the other two witnesses, in their statement under Section 2, Cr, the defense version given by the accused, the CRPC's allegation of acting in their defense is untrue and I was not able to trust and support of any evidence. The suspect fired 6 to 7 bullets at his pistol and killed the victim and seriously injured the victim, while he himself did not take a single punch on his body, leaving the suspect at risk of his life or a person. There was no serious injury of any kind, yet he resorted to repeated shootings. The accused's case was not covered by section 100, PPC. Conan failed to discharge the burden of proving his position under Article 121 of the evidence, the prosecution version of 1984 proved beyond any doubt and the conviction of the perpetrators was upheld. pakistani advocates Wana lawyer