KHAWAR MEHMOOD versus STATE
Section 9 (c) Testimony of Evidence The recovery witnesses fully supported the recovery of 40 kilograms of marijuana from the possession of the accused through their persuasive and reliably impressive convictions, the contradiction indicated in the evidence was trivial and the prosecution case. I was not fatal. There was only retreat and not credible, so large quantities of marijuana could not be charged that no hostility was suggested to the minor for minor repetition. The Investigating Officer was made, even otherwise, the provisions of Section 103, Cr PC under Section 25 of the Controlled Narcotic Substances Act 1997, and the conviction of the accused was maintained in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer
