PETER MASIH ALIAS ANDRAS versus STATE
Section 9 (c) the accused was detained on the day of the inquiry on the value of spying evidence, which ruled out the possibility of the prosecution witnesses being found false, even though the police officers had no charge against the accused. There was no enmity or malice and they were as good as public witnesses. The prosecution's evidence was consistent and affirmative and could not be ruled out simply because, as a police witness, Section 25 of the Drugs Act 1997, on the cases filed under Section 103, CRPC. Was banned. The said act could not be identified as illegal action or irregularity.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Noshki lawyer
