Find a Lawyer

KHAN MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / evidence 34) Definition of evidence was not taken advantage of doubt FIR was not abandoned in the case in which the identity of the parties was known to each other. There was no obstacle to the complainant's failure to do so. His complaint was closely linked to the witnesses. The complaining parties were already involved in criminal cases such as murder, an eyewitness appeared before the police and a Years and two months later the statement was made under Section 161, CR PC and no credibility could be attached to it. The independent witness was not cited nor presented, the motive for the incident was completely changed in the trial and the recovery from the accused was useless because the firearms expert reports, It is reported that the complainant had also introduced a new accused in the case, who was acquitted by the trial court A. Cooks were acquitted on the benefit of the doubt. law websites from Naseerabad lawyer