Find a Lawyer

LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, ISLAMABAD versus ALAUDDIN

Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Acquisition of land Determination of compensation amount Referred to the court The amount of land compensation received as raised by the Collector's Referee Court, the Authority filed an appeal against it. That the referee court appreciated the evidence on record in its original context and that compensation was increased for reasonable and reasonable reasons, which was unimaginable and could not be successfully challenged, however The appellant's lawyer's claim in the contest was not appreciated in its true context. And it was permanently dealt with by slip, there was no positive attempt to prove it, Hula Patwari's statement revealed that the land acquired was connected to the population and that the fish farm and orchards were also suit. Were around the land. On the contrary, the Land Acquisition Collector, on the contrary, failed to pay the collector on a one-year average compensation basis, without any justification, reason, and evidence, and the spirit of the law as determined by the referee court The referee could not know the court in such a manner. Appeal interrupted law firms from Gakhar Mandi lawyer