Find a Lawyer

NASEEB MUHAMMAD versus STATE

The appreciation of the testimony, section 9 (b) of the evidence, the reduction of prosecution witnesses had fully proved that the defendant's testimony for prohibited payment had long been subject to cross-examination, but no word came out of his mouth. Nothing too harsh came out. Suspending the recovery received from the witnesses by the prosecution, the suspect was placed in a motor vehicle and was taken into custody; nothing was recorded to prove that the witness, who was a police officer, There was animosity against the accused persons, legal proceedings against both the accused were in process. The law against them was maintained in accordance with the law and the punishment was taken on the question of punishment, because the total restriction on the possession of the accused was one kilogram of attention, which reduced the already passed person. , While the penalty for fines was also upheld immigration advocate from Neelam lawyer