Find a Lawyer

FARIDULLAH KHAN versus PROVINCE OF N.-W.F.P., THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

The notification to remove the Nazim Sports Complex, pending consideration of Article 199 constitutional petition, was inaugurated by the Chief Minister of MPA who wanted to inaugurate, saying that the Sports Complex instructed the DCO to make the MPA. Remove the nameboard Which was removed. The people of the area protested against the removal of the plaque and they not only staged a procession under the leadership of the petitioner (Tehsil Nazim), but also tried to mark the plaque, which culminated in the action against the Petitioner Commission. Of the two members constituted by the Chief Minister, submitted their report and the Chief Minister suspended the first applicant in light of the above report and finally issued a notification for his dismissal, when he was banned on the direction of the Chief Minister. The plaque's refurbishment was never discussed until it could be said that the violation of the Chief Minister's directive could not be proved against the applicant, when his inquiry with the applicant was not established on the finding of the Commission's record. Which was based on no evidence. The very conditions for granting jurisdiction to the tribunal or any forum forum can be very conditioned by the judiciary or the judicial authority that it must decide before the law. The law required that its search be based on a proper scrutiny of the evidence so that the search would not qualify for any other fate, but rather when it was based on a misinterpretation. Or not reading the evidence, misinterpretation of law and facts or without evidence, the High Court, while accepting the constitutional petition, set aside the entire proceeding, including defective orders. advocate from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer