Find a Lawyer

FAZAL-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Section 9 (c) definition of evidence, the huge reduction of five kilograms of marijuana in the conviction was recovered from the direct and physical possession of the accused. The offense was misdirected. The prosecution, with state witnesses, had, in the circumstances, successfully proved his case against the accused and the trial, he had rightly sentenced the accused to be the first offender and his former involvement in such crimes. There is nothing in the record about being, it looked like he was punished. To be harsh on those who deserved to retain the conviction, the trial court reduced him to ten years imprisonment for four years \ RI and reduced the fine to Rs. \ Nwas done best advocate from Muridkay lawyer