MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHEIKH versus PUNJAB UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR, LAHORE
Appellants were charged with imposing Section 3, 5 and 10 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 mandatory retirement penalty when appellant alleged that the charge sheet was unauthorized. Was. The inquiry officer, while the statement of the indictment was signed. The legal disciplinary proceedings initiated against the appellant were declared illegal because the Punjab Removal Service (Special Powers) under the definition of the Ordinance 2000, was expressly told that the inquiry order and the statement of charges were authorized. Authority will be signed and, since the Inquiry Officer Charge Sheet will only inform the accused Complainant Authority of the Appellant as the Registrar for the Appellant, the Inquiry Officer could not sign the Charge Sheet, the personal hearing also got its approval. Was. The Vice-Chancellor, who was not a competent authority whose order as an Registrar of Arbitrators, issued disallowed orders, while he himself had to approve a personal hearing and was told that in view of the grave defect. A retaliatory action must be taken against the appellant, the unidentified orders were set aside, and the appellant was reinstated. In the service of confronting new proceedings, including regular inquiry proceedings, giving the appellant a defense opportunity under the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
