MADAD ALI HAIDER, EX-ASSISTANT SUB-INSPECTOR versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) Appellant was dismissed from the job after issuing a job, first he was absent from duty without obtaining leave or prior permission; Was involved in a criminal case. The appellant's lawyer cited several documents for the record to claim that the appellant was not absent during the period as the respondent alleged that the appellant's involvement in the criminal case, Appellant per second has no position to be liable for punishment. Under the Punjab Removal of Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, unless a decision is made by a proof or a judgment of a criminal case and the departmental proceedings are appealed by adopting a major summer mode of dismissal of the service. Imposed on the user. Issuing a showcase notice that was not appropriate, because disputed questions were not sustainable in the eyes of the law because regular questioning was not appropriate in this case, which included a contentious question on the facts. Was set aside, and the appellant was ordered to be re-served. Department proceedings against the appellant will be considered pending.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
