RASHID MEHMOOD versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF ARID AGRICULTURE, RAWALPINDI
Section 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 imposed a sentence of service dismissal after appellant was questioned on charges of tampering with the record and accused of corruption. Was sentenced to dismissal. The Chancellor had appealed to the University Syndicate to appeal against the removal order, no doubt that the Appellant had been appealed to a wrong forum that he had The appeal should have been sent to the Chancellor. The Syndicate's office, it was not correct, the appellant should have taken a lawful way to file an appeal before the University Syndicate, and, it would be inappropriate to exclude the appellant merely on the basis that the appellant filed before an invalid forum. was done. Despite filing a departmental appeal within a timely manner, though, before any wrong forum, it can be directed to appear before the proprietor before the applicant before the University Syndicate for appropriate decision to the Registrar of the University of the University of Syngent. The appeals filed by the Department were required to be accepted, an invalid order under which the Appellant's Department of Appeal was rejected because the time limit was set aside. And the Registrar was directed to appeal to the Appellant's Representation / Tribunal before the Laws Complaints Syndicate \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
