AHMAD IJAZ, EX-RESEARCH ASSISTANT, PAKISTAN STUDY CENTRE, UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE versus VICE-CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
Sections 3, 5, 6, 7 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the Appeals of the Service have been terminated after the Appellant's services were charged and inquired against, they have taken action against the Appellant. Filed an appeal against. The Service (Special Powers) Ordinance has been started and completed under the Punjab Removal Claims since 2000, so it cannot be claimed that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction in this matter, for the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000. There are no provisions in removing Punjab. If the appointment of a competent officer was to be conducted regularly against the appellant, the appropriate charge sheet / statement about the charges should have been prepared by the authorized authority and could be communicated to the inquiry officer. The appropriate charge sheet / statement of the allegation was not prepared and the appellant was not provided with the opportunity to inspect the witnesses if the appeal was filed against a wrongful authority, which could be referred to the appellate authority's procedure. That the Punjab Removal Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 was not followed, the case was sent to the competent authority for de novo action against the appellant. By law the impend order was set aside and the appellant was reinstated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
