Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, CIVIL LINES, LAHORE

Section 6 and 8 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 certification and promotion authority Appellant was promoted as Head Constable and has served as Head Constable since its development. But they were not promoted as Section I. There was a record of irregular service and in such circumstances his juniors in the police rolls were promoted to the rank of sub-inspector, provided that the departmental officers were obliged to confirm the progress of the officers after the completion of the stipulated period. , Appellant could not be certified for lack of department authority. With no negative entry in his service record, the appellant deserved certification in the post of head constable since he was appointed to the post. The police rules stated that police officers must attend the promotion course. I should be sent. History and they were not allowed to exceed the maximum allowed to attend the training course, but due to the slowdown and inaction by the officers of the department, the appellant was exceeded, under which the officers of the department Appellant was not eligible for Intermediate Class Course, was not accepted at such a confusing stage, Appellant's claim for further development was made, the department was instructed as Head Constable in this date. Will confirm that when he was promoted to appellant, his next junior as a Section I would be accepted. The QI was granted would be allowed to be certified as A Section I as a Section I. From his history of development to his position and he missed all the financial benefits famous supreme court advocate from Gujrat lawyer