Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Sections 3, 5, 6 and 10 apply the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 pay scale lower penalties and the recovery of 50 percent loss, the lower penalties for lower level in the Appeal Pay Scale and After the charge sheet and the inquiry against it, 50% loss was recovered on the inquiry but the inquiry proceedings were carried out in a strange manner and the appellant was given no opportunity to cross-inspect and the inquiry officer recorded Examined and developed his role as well. A questionnaire about each of the allegations and then the appellant's answers were sought after which no separate statement of the appellant was recorded nor was he asked to present any defense if he was to explain the answers. And the questionnaire did not meet the requirements of the law because in this event the appellant was limited to the answers to the questions that were posed to him, when he was allowed to include his evidence in defense. Will express. There is freedom to bring any other evidence to the fore. The recording of the statement in the form of a questionnaire was rejected. In the absence of law in the circumstances, the trial hearing was de novo and the appellant will have a prosecution. It is understood that the pending authority is yet to appoint an inquiry officer to specialize in the inquiry. best law firms from Kasur lawyer