MUHAMMAD KABAL KHAN versus STATE
Section 9 The definition of evidence, conviction, conviction of the perpetrators of the guilty verdict was based on good sound basis - prohibited in large quantities from direct and physical possession of the prohibition - for which the recovered marijuana was recovered. Was unable to provide a plausible explanation. Government witnesses had positive testimony, such as in cases, that could not be doubted, unless there was an ill will or personal injury to the record prosecution, in which case the defendant could have legally proven his trial and trial. The court truly punished the accused. There was no record of him being the first culprit and his previous involvement in such crimes, the amount of punishment awarded by the trial court to the accused seemed harsh, while the defendant was convicted. Keeping in mind, the sentence given to the accused is reduced to three years from three years \ RI and a fine of Rs. 50,000 has been reduced to Rs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Piplan lawyer